Skip to main content

News

Diversity Equity & Inclusion March 10, 2020

Older women with breast cancer may benefit from genetic testing

By Krista Conger

Postmenopausal women with breast cancer are as likely as Ashkenazi Jewish women to carry inherited breast-cancer mutations that can inform treatment, a Stanford study found.

test Allison Kurian

About 1 in 40 postmenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 65 have cancer-associated mutations in their BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, according to a study led by researchers at the Stanford School of Medicine.  

The prevalence of the mutations in this group is similar to that of Ashkenazi Jewish women, whom the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force suggests should discuss their cancer risk with their physicians to determine if genetic testing is warranted. Currently, most guidelines don't address testing postmenopausal women with breast cancer in the absence of other risk factors.

The finding is the first to suggest that postmenopausal women who have been newly diagnosed with breast cancer but who don't have any hereditary risk factors, such as close family members diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50, may still benefit from genetic testing for inherited cancer-associated mutations.

Identifying women with inherited cancer-associated mutations, particularly in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, is important because some of the mutations also substantially increase the risk of other cancers, including ovarian cancer. Because these mutations are passed through families, knowing that a woman carries one of these mutations may encourage her healthy relatives to discuss their own risk factors with their doctors.

"There's been a lot of controversy in the field as to whether every woman with breast cancer should receive genetic testing," said Allison Kurian, MD, MSc, associate professor of medicine and of epidemiology and population health at Stanford, "in part because we didn't know how prevalent cancer-associated mutations are in this largest subgroup of newly diagnosed people - that is, women who develop breast cancer after menopause without the presence of any known hereditary risk factors."

Kurian is the lead author of the study, which was published March 10 in JAMA. Marcia Stefanick, PhD, professor of medicine and of obstetrics and gynecology at Stanford, is the senior author of the study.

Cancer-associated variants

Unlike mutations that accumulate over time, specifically in cancer cells, germline mutations are inherited and are found in every cell of the body. 

Marcia Stefanick Marcia Stefanick

Physicians primarily consider a woman's age at diagnosis and her family's cancer history when determining whether to recommend genetic testing. A woman diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50, for example, or a healthy woman with several close family members who have had breast or ovarian cancer, is more likely to be referred for genetic testing than a postmenopausal woman with breast cancer and no other risk factors.

For the study, Kurian and Stefanick and their colleagues set out to compare the prevalence of cancer-associated mutations in 10 breast-cancer risk genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2. They compared 2,195 women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at an average age of 73 with 2,322 women without breast cancer.

The data for the study came from more than 4,500 participants in the long-running Women's Health Initiative. The initiative enrolled more than 160,000 women ages 50 to 79 throughout the United States between 1993 to 1998 to conduct the largest study of postmenopausal health in the country. Stefanick served as chair of the initiative's steering committee for most of the project.

The researchers found that about 3.5% of the women with breast cancer in their study had a cancer-associated mutation in at least one of the 10 genes, compared with about 1.3% of women without cancer. When they narrowed their focus to just the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in women diagnosed before age 65, they found that about 2.2% of women with breast cancers had cancer-associated mutations, versus about 1.1% of those without breast cancer.

Only about 31% of those women with cancer and 20% of those without cancer, both with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, were likely to have been recommended for testing under the current guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

"Now we know that the prevalence of cancer-associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women diagnosed with breast cancer after menopause rivals that in women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent - a population that is currently encouraged to discuss genetic testing with their doctors," Kurian said. "We finally have a read on the likely benefit of testing this most common subgroup of breast cancer patients."

Researchers from Myriad Genetics Inc., the University of California-San Diego and the  State University of New York contributed to the study.

The research was supported by Myriad Genetics, the Suzanne Pride Bryan Fund for Breast Cancer Research, the Jan Weimer Faculty Chair in Breast Oncology and the BRCA Foundation.

About Stanford Medicine

Stanford Medicine is an integrated academic health system comprising the Stanford School of Medicine and adult and pediatric health care delivery systems. Together, they harness the full potential of biomedicine through collaborative research, education and clinical care for patients. For more information, please visit med.stanford.edu.

Krista-Conger

Science writer

Krista Conger

Senior science writer Krista Conger, PhD ’99, covers cancer, stem cells, dermatology, developmental biology, endocrinology, pathology, hematology, radiation oncology and LGBTQ+ issues for the office. She received her undergraduate degree in biochemistry at the University of California, Berkeley and her PhD in cancer biology from Stanford University. After completing the science writing program at UC Santa Cruz, she joined the Stanford Medicine Office of Communications in 2000. She enjoys distilling complicated scientific topics into engaging prose accessible to the layperson. Over the years, she has had chronicled nascent scientific discoveries from their inception to Food and Drug Administration approval and routine clinical use — documenting the wonder and long arc of medical research. Her writing has repeatedly been recognized with awards from the Counsel for the Advancement and Support of Education and the Association of American Medical Colleges. She is a member of the National Academy of Science Writers and a certified science editor through the Board of Editors in the Life Sciences. In her spare time, she enjoys textile arts, experimenting with new recipes and hiking in beautiful northwestern Montana, where she was raised and now lives.