A study in mice has found that a commonly used antibiotic can be modified to eliminate the risk that it will cause hearing loss.
January 2, 2015 - By Tracie White
On Christmas Eve, 2002, Bryce Faber was diagnosed with a deadly cancer called neuroblastoma. The 2-year-old’s treatment, which, in addition to surgery, included massive amounts of radiation followed by even more massive amounts of antibiotics, no doubt saved his life. But those same mega-doses of antibiotics, while staving off infections in his immunosuppressed body, caused a permanent side effect: deafness.
“All I remember is coming out of treatment not being able to hear anything,” said Bryce, now a healthy 14-year-old living in Arizona. “I asked my mom, ‘Why have all the people stopped talking?’” He was 90 percent deaf.
“The loss has been devastating,” said his father, Bart Faber. “But not as devastating as losing him would have been.”
Treatment with aminoglycosides, the most commonly used class of antibiotics worldwide, is often a lifesaving necessity. But an estimated 20-60 percent of all patients who receive these antibiotics suffer partial or complete hearing loss.
Now, in a study that will be published online Jan. 2 in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine report that they have developed a modified version of an aminoglycoside that works effectively in mice without the risk of causing deafness or kidney damage, another common side effect.
The researchers hope to test versions of the modified antibiotic in humans as soon as possible.
“If we can eventually prevent people from going deaf from taking these antibiotics, in my mind, we will have been successful,” said Anthony Ricci, PhD, professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery and co-senior author of the study. “Our goal is to replace the existing aminoglycosides with ones that aren’t toxic.”
Four years in the making
It took the scientists four years of research to produce 5 grams of the newly patented antibiotic, N1MS, which is derived from sisomicin, a type of aminoglycoside.
N1MS cured urinary tract infection in mice just as well as the parent compound, but did not cause deafness, study results show. The study presents a promising new approach to generating a new class of novel, nontoxic antibiotics, Ricci said.
The two senior authors — Ricci and Alan Cheng, MD, associate professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery — joined forces in 2007 to explore the idea of creating new and improved versions of aminoglycosides based on a simple yet groundbreaking idea born of Ricci’s basic science research into the biophysics of how hearing works within the inner ear.
“It’s a nice example of how basic science research is directly translatable into clinical applications,” said Ricci.
Ricci is an expert on the process by which sound waves open ion channels within the sensory hair cells of the inner ear, allowing their conversion to electrical signals that eventually reach the brain.
Because aminoglycosides cause deafness by killing these nonregenerating hair cells, Ricci postulated, why not simply make the drug molecules unable to enter the cells’ channels?
The idea made sense to Cheng.
“As a clinician-scientist, I treat kids with hearing loss,” Cheng said. “When a drug causes hearing loss it is devastating, and it’s especially disturbing when this happens to a young child as they rely on hearing to acquire speech.
“When I came to Stanford seven years ago from the University of Washington, I was exploring the angle that maybe we could add drugs to protect the ear from toxicity. Tony brought up this new idea: Why don’t we just not let the drug get in? Great idea, I thought. When do we start to work?”
A potent antibiotic
For 20 years, and despite newer, alternative antibiotics, aminoglycosides have remained the mainstay treatment worldwide for many bacterial diseases, including pneumonia, peritonitis and sepsis. They also are often used when other antibiotics have failed to treat infections of unknown origins.
When a drug causes hearing loss it is devastating, and it’s especially disturbing when this happens to a young child as they rely on hearing to acquire speech.
Their popularity is due, in part, to their low cost, lack of need for refrigeration and effectiveness at treating bacterial infections at a time when the declining potency of antibiotics is a major public health concern. They are frequently used in neonatal intensive care units to battle infections, or even the threat of infections, which pose a mortal risk for babies. Exactly how many premature babies from suffer hearing loss as a side effect of treatment with the drug is unknown, Ricci said.
“The toxicity of these drugs is something we accept as a necessary evil,” said Daria Mochly-Rosen, PhD, director of SPARK, a program at Stanford that assists scientists in moving their discoveries from bench to bedside.
SPARK worked closely with Ricci and Cheng, providing both the funding and the expertise necessary as they entered the new landscape of drug development. “Being an expert on the inner ear put Dr. Ricci in a unique position to help design a better drug — one that would be a huge advantage, especially for premature babies,” Mochly-Rosen said. “This is a project that could make a huge difference in human health.”
For decades, researchers have looked for ways of preventing aminoglycosides from killing off the hearing cells of the inner ear, Ricci said.
“So many approaches have failed,” Ricci said. “The main problem has been that if you succeeded in stopping the drug from killing hair cells, then you also stopped its antimicrobial effect. The drug just doesn’t work anymore.”
The goal, Ricci said, was to keep the antibacterial properties of the drug intact while preventing it from entering the inner-ear cell’s ion channels. He and his fellow researchers used data from structural biologists at Stanford who better understood how the antibiotics fought off infection.
If we can eventually prevent people from going deaf from taking these antibiotics, in my mind, we will have been successful.
“We figured, well, let’s not mess with that part of the drug,” Ricci said. “We targeted sites on the drug molecule that were not involved in the antimicrobial activity that kills off infection. This allowed us to reduce toxicity to the ear while retaining antimicrobial action.”
The researchers made nine different compounds derived from sisomicin. All nine were significantly less toxic than sisomicin to hair cells when tested in the laboratory. Three of the nine were comparable to sisomicin in inhibiting the growth of and killing E. coli bacteria. Of the three derivatives, however, N1MS was the most effective against the bacteria, and the researchers used it to successfully treat E. coli-caused bladder infection in a mouse model while leaving hearing intact. They also found that, unlike the parent compound, N1MS was nontoxic to the kidneys.
“We postulate that entry into kidney cells is also through a channel, and so entry is reduced here as well,” Ricci said. “It is speculation at this point because unlike with the hair cell, we have not measured drug entry into the kidney cells, but it seems reasonable.”
Other Stanford co-authors are postdoctoral scholars Markus Huth, MD, Yi-Ju Hsieh, PhD, Thomas Effertz, PhD, Kyu-Hee Han, MD, and Sarah Verhoeven, MD; research assistants Kayvon Sotoudeh and Andrew Vu, MD; Michael Hsieh, MD, PhD, assistant professor of urology; and SPARK chemistry consultant Robert Greenhouse, PhD.
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (grants P30DC010363, K08DK087895, K08DC011043, R21DC012183, RO1DC003896 and RO1DC013910), the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Jerry Yang Faculty Scholar Fund and SPARK.
Information about Stanford’s Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, which also supported the work, is available at http://med.stanford.edu/ohns/.
For information on Stanford’s Hearing Loss Initiative, visit: https://hearinglosscure.stanford.edu/.
Stanford Medicine integrates research, medical education and health care at its three institutions - Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford Health Care, and Stanford Children's Health. For more information, please visit the Office of Communications website at http://mednews.stanford.edu.