Bio

Clinical Focus


  • Anesthesia

Academic Appointments


Professional Education


  • Fellowship:Stanford University School of Medicine (2011) CA
  • Board Certification: Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography, National Board of Echocardiography (2012)
  • Residency:University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (2009) PA
  • Fellowship:Stanford Hospital and Clinics - Critical Care (2012) CA
  • Board Certification: Anesthesia, American Board of Anesthesiology (2010)
  • Internship:University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (2006) PA
  • Medical Education:Northeastern Ohio Universities (2005) OH
  • Fellowship, Stanford University Medical Center CA (2012)
  • Residency, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PA (2009)

Teaching

Graduate and Fellowship Programs


Publications

Journal Articles


  • A cost study of postoperative cell salvage in the setting of elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty TRANSFUSION Rao, V. K., Dyga, R., Bartels, C., Waters, J. H. 2012; 52 (8): 1750-1760

    Abstract

    The increasing costs, limited supply, and clinical risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusion have prompted investigation into autologous blood management strategies, such as postoperative red blood cell (RBC) salvage. This study provides a cost comparison of transfusing washed postoperatively salvaged RBCs using an orthopedic perioperative autotransfusion device (OrthoPat, Haemonetics Corporation) versus unwashed shed blood and banked allogeneic blood.Cell salvage data were retrospectively reviewed for a sample of 392 patients who underwent primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Mean unit costs were calculated for washed salvaged RBCs, equivalent units of unwashed shed blood, and therapeutically equivalent volumes of allogeneic RBCs.No initial capital investment was required for the establishment of the postoperative cell salvage program. For patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the mean unit costs for washed postoperatively salvaged cells, unwashed shed blood, and allogeneic banked blood were $758.80, $474.95, and $765.49, respectively. In patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), the mean unit costs for washed postoperatively salvaged cells, unwashed shed blood, and allogeneic banked blood were $1827.41, $1167.41, and $2609.44, respectively.This analysis suggests that transfusing washed postoperatively salvaged cells using the OrthoPat device is more costly than using unwashed shed blood in both THA and TKA. When compared to allogeneic transfusion, washed postoperatively salvaged cells carry a comparable cost in TKA, but potentially represent a significant savings in patients undergoing THA. Sensitivity analysis suggests that in the case of TKA, however, cost comparability exists within a narrow range of units collected and infused.

    View details for DOI 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03531.x

    View details for Web of Science ID 000307392800017

    View details for PubMedID 22339139

  • Recognition of local anesthetic maldistribution in axillary brachial plexus block guided by ultrasound and nerve stimulation JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA Veneziano, G. C., Rao, V. K., Orebaugh, S. L. 2012; 24 (2): 141-144

    Abstract

    Nerve stimulation may occur despite the presence of a fascial barrier between the needle tip and the nerve, which may prevent appropriate flow or distribution of local anesthetic solution. During an axillary nerve block, ultrasound (US) guidance was used to identify the median nerve. Insertion of a needle with US and nerve stimulator guidance resulted in the appearance of the needle tip in contact with the nerve. However, as local anesthetic injection was begun, it was clear that the injectate was accumulating superficial to the investing fascia of the neurovascular bundle. No injectate was seen below the fascia. With US guidance, the needle was repositioned at a greater depth. Repeat injection of local anesthetic clearly flowed around the nerve.

    View details for DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.06.009

    View details for Web of Science ID 000301894600012

    View details for PubMedID 22414707

  • Analysis of major complications associated with arterial catheterisation QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE Salmon, A. A., Galhotra, S., Rao, V., DeVita, M. A., Darby, J., Hilmi, I., SIMMONS, R. L. 2010; 19 (3): 208-212

    Abstract

    Arterial catheterisation is used for continuous haemodynamic monitoring in patients undergoing surgery and in critical care units. Although it is considered a safe procedure, a major complication such as arterial occlusion and limb gangrene can occur.To determine the incidence, outcome and potential to avoid complications associated with arterial catheterisation.The number of arterial catheterisation was determined using an anaesthesiology and critical care medicine billing database over a period of 4 years (1 January 2003 to 31 December 2006). Possible major complications were identified from two hospital databases; all identified charts were screened and then reviewed by an expert panel that determined causation. A major complication was defined as requiring operative intervention and/or resulting in permanent harm.15 (0.084%) major complications were identified among 17 840 instances of arterial catheterisation insertions. Of 15 arterial catheterisations, nine were performed in the operating room and six in the intensive care unit. Nine patients suffered ischaemic injury, which progressed to gangrene in three patients. Three patients developed haematoma that required surgical evacuation; two of these required vascular repair. One patient had compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy and two patients had sheared catheter fragments that needed to be removed. All 15 patients had multiple comorbidities, and those in the operating room had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of >or=3. Seven (46.6%) had arterial catheterisation done under emergent circumstances. Six (40%) died during hospitalisation because of complications unrelated to arterial catheterisation.Arterial catheterisation had a very low rate of major complications. They seem associated with high severity of illness and emergency surgery.

    View details for DOI 10.1136/qshc.2008.028597

    View details for Web of Science ID 000279355700010

    View details for PubMedID 20194221

Stanford Medicine Resources: