Bio

Bio


Valerie Sugiyama, MD is a double-boarded specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Gynecology Oncology. She is passionate about treating patients who have gynecological malignancies or who have surgical specialty needs. She has worked both in the academic and community hospital settings since 2009. She can speak a limited amount of medical Spanish.

Clinical Focus


  • Gynecology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Gynecology oncology

Academic Appointments


Professional Education


  • Board Certification: Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2010)
  • Board Certification: Gynecologic Oncology, American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2012)
  • Fellowship:Stanford University - Fellowship (2009) CA
  • Residency:Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School (2006) MA
  • Internship:Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School (2003) MA
  • Medical Education:University of California Irvine (2002) CA

Publications

All Publications


  • Management of melanomas of the female genital tract CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY Sugiyama, V. E., Chan, J. K., Kapp, D. S. 2008; 20 (5): 565-569

    Abstract

    The significant increase in cutaneous melanomas over the past 30 years has led to studies resulting in advances in their diagnosis, staging, surgical treatment, and adjuvant therapies. Similar approaches have been investigated in patients with far rarer malignant melanomas of the female genital tract. This review will summarize the current state of knowledge on the incidence, causes, presenting symptoms, prognostic factors, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes, site-by-site, for primary melanomas of the vulva, vagina, urethra, ovary, and the uterine cervix.Surgery remains the initial treatment of choice for localized melanomas of the female genital tract, with less radical, organ function preserving resections demonstrating similar control rates compared with more radical surgical approaches in vulva and possibly vaginal melanomas. Radiation therapy may play a role in the treatment of patients with close resection margins, regional nodal metastasis, or unresectable tumors. Sentinel lymph node studies, positron emission tomography and computed tomography scans for staging and evaluation of response, and adjuvant chemo or biochemotherapy warrant further investigation.The results of treatment for female genital tract melanomas remain poor. Although surgery remains the initial treatment of choice for localized disease, adjuvant local-regional, and systemic therapies are needed.

    View details for Web of Science ID 000258991100014

    View details for PubMedID 19106662

  • Analysis of phase II studies on targeted agents and subsequent phase III trials: What are the predictors for success? JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY Chan, J. K., Ueda, S. M., Sugiyama, V. E., Stave, C. D., Shin, J. Y., Monk, B. J., Sikic, B. I., Osann, K., Kapp, D. S. 2008; 26 (9): 1511-1518

    Abstract

    To identify the characteristics of phase II studies that predict for subsequent "positive" phase III trials (those that reached the proposed primary end points of study or those wherein the study drug was superior to the standard regimen investigating targeted agents in advanced tumors.We identified all phase III clinical trials of targeted therapies against advanced cancers published from 1985 to 2005. Characteristics of the preceding phase II studies were reviewed to identify predictive factors for success of the subsequent phase III trial. Data were analyzed using the chi(2) test and logistic regression models.Of 351 phase II studies, 167 (47.6%) subsequent phase III trials were positive and 184 (52.4%) negative. Phase II studies from multiple rather than single institutions were more likely to precede a successful trial (60.4% v 39.4%; P < .001). Positive phase II results were more likely to lead to a successful phase III trial (50.8% v 22.5%; P = .003). The percentage of successful trials from pharmaceutical companies was significantly higher compared with academic, cooperative groups, and research institutes (89.5% v 44.2%, 45.2%, and 46.3%, respectively; P = .002). On multivariate analysis, these factors and shorter time interval between publication of phase II results and III study publication were independent predictive factors for a positive phase III trial.In phase II studies of targeted agents, multiple- versus single-institution participation, positive phase II trial, pharmaceutical company-based trials, and shorter time period between publication of phase II to phase III trial were independent predictive factors of success in a phase III trial. Investigators should be cognizant of these factors in phase II studies before designing phase III trials.

    View details for DOI 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8874

    View details for Web of Science ID 000254178600020

    View details for PubMedID 18285603

  • Vulvar melanoma - A multivariable analysis of 644 patients OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY Sugiyama, V. E., Chan, J. K., Shin, J. Y., Berek, J. S., Osann, K., Kapp, D. S. 2007; 110 (2): 296-301

    Abstract

    To determine the prognostic factors associated with the survival of vulvar melanoma patients.Data were obtained from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database from 1973 to 2003. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models were used for analysis.Of the 644 vulvar melanoma patients, the median age was 68 years. Of these 572 women were white, 28 were Hispanic, 18 were African-American, and 14 were Asian. A total of 302 had localized disease, 168 had regional disease, and 28 had distant disease. Of the participants who underwent surgical resection, 171 (26.6%) had conservative surgery, 164 (25.5%) had radical excision, and 241 (37.5%) had unspecified surgical resections. One hundred seventy-nine (27.8%) had lymph node resections, and 33 patients had concurrent radiation therapy. Nodal metastases were identified in 58 (9%) of the participants. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates for those with localized, regional, and distant disease were 75.5%, 38.7%, and 22.1%, respectively (P<.001). Women aged 68 years or younger had a better survival rate than older patients (72.0% compared with 47.7%; P<.001). Those with 0, 1, and 2 or more positive lymph nodes had survival rates of 68.3%, 29%, and 19.5%, respectively (P<.001). In a multivariable analysis, younger age, localized disease, and negative lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors for improved survival.Age, stage, and lymph node involvement were significant factors for survival in vulvar melanoma.III.

    View details for Web of Science ID 000248290500011

    View details for PubMedID 17666603

  • Margin distance and other clinico-pathologic prognostic factors in vulvar carcinoma: A multivariate analysis GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY Chan, J. K., Sugiyama, V., Pham, H., Gu, M., Rutgers, J., Osann, K., Cheung, M. K., Berman, M. L., DiSaia, P. J. 2007; 104 (3): 636-641

    Abstract

    To determine the importance of margin status and other prognostic factors associated with the recurrence and survival of patients with squamous cell vulvar carcinoma.Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. All slides were re-reviewed by two gynecologic pathologists.Ninety patients (median age: 69) were treated for vulvar carcinoma from 1984 to 2002, including 28 FIGO stage I, 20 stage II, 26 stage III and 16 with stage IV disease. Sixty-three (70%) patients underwent complete radical vulvectomies and 27 (30%) had modified radical vulvectomies. Nineteen (20%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Five-year disease-specific survival rates were 100%, 100%, 86% and 29% for stages I-IV, respectively. None of the 30 patients with a pathologic margin distance >8 mm had local recurrence. Of the 53 women with tumor-free pathologic margin of <8 mm, 12 (23%) had a local recurrence. Moreover, women with >2 positive groin nodes had significantly higher recurrence risk compared to those with <2 metastatic groin nodes (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, positive groin nodes and margin distance were important prognostic factors for recurrence. Moreover, stage, tumor size, margin distance, and depth of invasion were significant independent predictors for disease-specific survival. The median follow-up was 58 months (range: 2-188).Pathologic margin distance is an important predictor of local vulvar recurrence. Our data suggest that a > or =8-mm pathologic margin clearance leads to a high rate of loco-regional control.

    View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.10.004

    View details for Web of Science ID 000244796500023

    View details for PubMedID 17095080

  • Conservative clitoral preservation surgery in the treatment of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma 31st Annual Meeting of the Western-Association-of-Gynecologic-Oncologists Chan, J. K., Sugiyama, V., Tajalli, T. R., Pham, H., Gu, M., Rutgers, J., Monk, B. J. ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE. 2004: 152?56

    Abstract

    To determine the safety and efficacy of clitoral-sparing surgery in women with squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the anterior vulva not involving the clitoris.Patients with vulvar SCCA diagnosed between 1984 and 2000 were identified and data collected. In this descriptive analysis, women treated with complete radical vulvectomy were compared to those treated with clitoral-sparing modified radical vulvectomy. All slides were re-reviewed.Of the 41 women with vulvar carcinoma, 13 had clitoral-sparing modified vulvectomies (group A) while the remaining 28 underwent complete radical vulvectomies (group B). The 13 patients in group A included, 8 with stage I, 2 stage II, 2 stage III, and 1 with stage IV disease. The two groups had similar demographic and pathologic prognostic factors. After a median follow-up of 59 months, no patients in group A had loco-regional failure.Clitoral-sparing vulvar cancer surgery does not compromise the rate of loco-regional control in patients and may be offered to selected women.

    View details for DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.004

    View details for Web of Science ID 000224328700023

    View details for PubMedID 15385125

Footer Links:

Stanford Medicine Resources: