Publications

All Publications


  • Peer Teaching by Stanford Medical Students in a Sexual and Gender Minority Health Education Program Medical Science Educator Gomez, J., Gisondi, M. A. 2020: 3
  • Mechanisms Associated with Clinical Improvement in Interventions That Address Health-Related Social Needs: A Mixed-Methods Analysis POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT Berkowitz, S. A., Hulberg, A., Placzek, H., Dangora, A., Gomez, J., Standish, S., Atlas, S. J. 2019; 22 (5): 399–405
  • Response to Letter to the Editor: 'Interactive home telemedicine and burns: A new method'. Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries Hickey, S., Gomez, J., Meller, B., Schneider, J., Cheney, M., Nejad, S., Schulz, J., Goverman, J. 2018; 44 (1): 233–34

    View details for DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2017.10.015

    View details for PubMedID 29169697

  • Interactive home telehealth and burns: A pilot study BURNS Hickey, S., Gomez, J., Meller, B., Schneider, J. C., Cheney, M., Nejad, S., Schulz, J., Goverman, J. 2017; 43 (6): 1318–21

    Abstract

    The objective of this study is to review our experience incorporating Interactive Home Telehealth (IHT) visits into follow-up burn care.A retrospective review of all burn patients participating in IHT encounters over the course of 15 months was performed. Connections were established through secure video conferencing and call-routing software. Patients connected with a personal computer or tablet and providers connected with a desktop computer with a high-definition web camera. In some cases, high-definition digital images were emailed to the provider prior to the virtual consultation. For each patient, the following was collected: (1) patient and injury demographics (diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management), (2) total number of encounters, (3) service for each encounter (burn, psychiatry, and rehabilitation), (4) length of visit, including travel distance and time saved and, (5) complications, including re-admissions and connectivity issues.52 virtual encounters were performed with 31 patients during the first year of the pilot project from March 2015 to June 2016. Mean age of the participant was 44 years (range 18-83 years). Mean total burn surface area of the participant was 12% (range 1-80%). Average roundtrip travel distance saved was 188 miles (range 4-822 miles). Average round trip travel time saved was 201min (range 20-564min). There were no unplanned re-admissions and no complications. Five connectivity issues were reported, none of which prevented completion of the visit.Interactive Home Telehealth is a safe and feasible modality for delivering follow-up care to burn patients. Burn care providers benefit from the potential to improve outpatient clinic utilization. Patients benefit from improved access to multiple members of their specialized burn care team, as well as cost-reductions for patient travel expenses. Future studies are needed to ensure patient and provider satisfaction and to further validate the significance, cost-effectiveness and safety.

    View details for DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.013

    View details for Web of Science ID 000410623300022

    View details for PubMedID 28641914

  • The Use of CO2 Fractional Photothermolysis for the Treatment of Burn Scars JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH Levi, B., Ibrahim, A., Mathews, K., Wojcik, B., Gomez, J., Fagan, S., Austen, W., Goverman, J. 2016; 37 (2): 106–14

    Abstract

    A recent advancement in the treatment of burn scars has been the use of the carbon dioxide (CO2) laser to perform fractional photothermolysis. In this analysis, we describe our results and patient-reported outcomes with the use of fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of burn-related scarring. We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent CO2 laser procedures for treatment of symptomatic burn scars and skin grafts at one accredited regional burn center. Burn injury and laser treatment demographics, as well as complications, are reported. A questionnaire was administered to all patients and included patient-reported outcome measures aimed at understanding the patient experience and their subjective response to treatment. A total of 387 CO2 laser procedures were performed on 131 patients for the treatment of symptomatic burn scars and skin grafts between October 1, 2011, and May 1, 2014 (average, 2.95 procedures/patient; range, 1-11). Average time between injury and first laser was 597.35 days (range, 60-13,475). Average time between laser treatments (when multiple) was 117.73 days (range, 22-514). There were no infections requiring treatment with oral antibiotics. Overall patient satisfaction with laser therapy was 96.7%. Patients reported reductions in neuropathic pain, tightness (contracture), and pruritus (54.0, 50.6, and 49.0%, respectively). Fractional photothermolysis utilizing the CO2 laser is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of symptomatic burn scars, donor sites, and skin grafts. Patient satisfaction with this procedure is high, and complications are low. Significant improvements in scar appearance, pliability, tightness, neuropathic pain, and pruritus were commonly reported.

    View details for DOI 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000285

    View details for Web of Science ID 000369865400004

    View details for PubMedID 26536539

Latest information on COVID-19