Two hearts are better than one for toddler who undergoes historic operation

STANFORD, Calif. – Camila Gonzalez now has two hearts beating separate rhythms inside her tiny chest. At 22 months of age, she became the youngest child in the United States to receive a donor’s heart while also retaining her original one.
Bruce Reitz, MD, professor and chair of cardiothoracic surgery at the Stanford University School of Medicine, connected a second heart to Camila’s on Sept. 16 at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford.
The procedure – called a heterotopic or “piggyback” heart transplant – was first developed in England 30 years ago to address a specific kind of heart problem. But Camila is the first child to undergo such a procedure in California and only the ninth child to receive a second heart in the United States. In adults the procedure is rare as well. Out of the 1,200 adult heart transplants performed at Stanford Hospital, only one other involved the piggyback procedure.
According to Reitz, Camila’s surgery was a success. This week she will leave the hospital for a three-month stay at the nearby Ronald McDonald House. “I think we’ve rejuvenated this procedure and shown that it can work in small children,” he said.

Credit: Abdulaziz Alkhaldi, MD heterotopic

Surgeons last month performed a heterotopic, or piggyback, heart transplant that involves connecting a donor's heart to the patient's heart, as shown in the diagram above. This was the first time the procedure was performed on a child in California.

Double hearts are a good choice for patients whose heart problems cause extremely high blood pressure in the pulmonary artery – the blood vessel that takes blood from the heart to the lungs. Such pressure often builds up in people with a weakened heart muscle, a condition known as cardiomyopathy.
In essence, the weakness in the left side of the heart – which pumps blood to the body – acts like a blockage in the system, causing blood pressure to rise in the lungs and from there back into the pulmonary artery and the right side of the heart. The right sides of these patients’ hearts are enlarged because they have adapted to the excess pressure.
Such a problem generally can’t be solved by replacing the ailing heart with a donor heart because the new one can’t adapt quickly enough to handle the excess pressure built up in the lungs.  “Put a new heart in with that pressure and it will fail,” said Dan Bernstein, MD, co-director of the Children’s Heart Center at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital and chief of pediatric cardiology. Bernstein has been caring for Camila since her surgery.
From 1997 to 2001, eight children received heterotopic heart transplants in the United States. Although five are alive today with their twin-hearts still working fine, the procedure had fallen out of favor because a heart-lung transplant is often appropriate for patients with conditions like Camila’s.
Reitz predicts, however, that Packard Hospital will perform more heterotopic heart transplants on kids in the future. “Once every two years or so we might encounter a pediatric patient for whom heterotopic heart transplantation would be a good option,” he said.  The number of children who are good candidates for the procedure is still limited, said Bernstein. But the wait for heart-lung donors is usually longer than the wait for a heart, and long-term survival is better for heart transplants alone.
Last February, Camila was diagnosed with restrictive cardiomyopathy, meaning that her heart muscle was not only weakened but stiff. Her heart muscle – particularly on the left side – couldn’t inflate properly when blood flowed into it from her lungs. As a result, the blood pressure in her lungs gradually built up over the period of about a year.
By the time of the surgery, the pressure in Camila’s lungs was five times normal levels, the right side of her heart was enlarged from trying to pump blood against so much pressure, and the left side continued to stiffen, making matters worse.
 “When she was presented as a possible candidate,” said Reitz, “it was clear she couldn’t survive a traditional transplant. The new heart would not be prepared to pump at high enough pressure.”  In addition, said Bernstein, “Camila was ideal for this surgery because the course of her disease wasn’t extremely long, so we believe there’s a good chance her lungs can remodel themselves back to normal.”
Reitz placed the second heart on the lung on the lower right side of Camila’s chest. “The donor heart is rotated and flipped over a bit,” he said. “It points off to the right in about the same way as a normal heart points off to the left.”
Adding a second heart is more difficult than traditional heart replacement because there are more complicated hookups, said Reitz. “You have to open the heart four times in order to make all the connections,” he said. “And it’s harder in kids because everything is a little more fragile in the smaller patient and more crowded.”
The important part is lining up the two left atria – the upper chamber on the left side of each heart – so they can be merged. “That’s really the function of the recipient heart that needs replacing,” explained Reitz. “If the left side of the donor heart works as it should, that allows the pulmonary pressure to come down.”
Four weeks after surgery, the blood pressure in Camila’s lungs has dropped to near-normal levels, said Bernstein. Although the two hearts are both working, each has its primary function. The oversized right side of Camila’s original heart pumps 90 percent of the blood to her lungs, while the donor heart’s left side pumps 90 percent of the blood to her body.
Over time, the right side of Camilla’s heart will return to a more normal size and will share its load more evenly with the right side of the donor heart.
Although they work and grow together, Camila’s two hearts beat at their own rhythms. The native heart, which is connected to Camila’s nervous system, responds more quickly to changes in Camila’s activity levels. On her electrocardiogram, Camila’s doctors can monitor both hearts at the same time because the peaks caused by each heart are easily distinguished.
Other risks that Camila faces are no different from traditional heart transplant recipients – including immune suppression problems and a chance of chronic rejection. Long-term, Camila can be expected to do as well as patients whose own hearts have been replaced by a single heart, Bernstein said.
“In the last five to 10 years, there’s been a marked improvement in long-term survival,” Bernstein said. “Of 17 heart transplants performed at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital last year, there have been no early deaths. Many of our heart transplant patients are doing very well 10 or 25 years post-transplant. There’s no reason to think Camila won’t do the same.”

Gonzalez Family Story

Maria and Salvador Gonzalez both worked as cooks at Harrah’s Casino in South Lake Tahoe, but Maria had to leave her job when 1-year-old Camila was diagnosed with restrictive cardiomyopathy.  According to the mother, Camila’s heart problems made her breathe very fast and sweat a lot. “She was cranky, not eating well and losing weight – two to three ounces each week,” she said.
Since February, Camila and her family waited for the toddler’s second heart. For three months they waited in the hospital, and then they waited at the Ronald McDonald House. Finally, in September, a donor heart became available.
Camila’s mother said that she is pleased with how Camila is recovering from transplant surgery. “I can see a big difference from before the transplant to after,” she said. “Now she’s eating a lot and she’s more friendly.”  Camila is also busy with her favorite activities. “She always has a piece of paper and a pencil in her hand,” said her mother. “She loves to draw.”

About Stanford Medicine

Stanford Medicine is an integrated academic health system comprising the Stanford School of Medicine and adult and pediatric health care delivery systems. Together, they harness the full potential of biomedicine through collaborative research, education and clinical care for patients. For more information, please visit

2024 ISSUE 1

Psychiatry’s new frontiers