Publications

Abstract

This work presents a deep learning approach for rapid and accurate muscle water T2 with subject-specific fat T2 calibration using multi-spin-echo acquisitions. This method addresses the computational limitations of conventional bi-component Extended Phase Graph fitting methods (nonlinear-least-squares and dictionary-based) by leveraging fully connected neural networks for fast processing with minimal computational resources. We validated the approach through in vivo experiments using two different MRI vendors. The results showed strong agreement of our deep learning approach with reference methods, summarized by Lin's concordance correlation coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.97. Further, the deep learning method achieved a significant computational time improvement, processing data 116 and 33 times faster than the nonlinear least squares and dictionary methods, respectively. In conclusion, the proposed approach demonstrated significant time and resource efficiency improvements over conventional methods while maintaining similar accuracy. This methodology makes the processing of water T2 data faster and easier for the user and will facilitate the utilization of the use of a quantitative water T2 map of muscle in clinical and research studies.

View details for DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-58812-2

View details for PubMedID 38589478

View details for PubMedCentralID 6398566

Abstract

A reduced left atrial (LA) strain correlates with the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Conventional atrial strain analysis uses two-dimensional (2D) imaging, which is, however, limited by atrial foreshortening and an underestimation of through-plane motion. Retrospective gated computed tomography (RGCT) produces high-fidelity three-dimensional (3D) images of the cardiac anatomy throughout the cardiac cycle that can be used for estimating 3D mechanics. Its feasibility for LA strain measurement, however, is understudied.The aim of this study is to develop and apply a novel workflow to estimate 3D LA motion and calculate the strain from RGCT imaging. The utility of global and regional strains to separate heart failure in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with and without AF is investigated.A cohort of 30 HFrEF patients with (n = 9) and without (n = 21) AF underwent RGCT prior to cardiac resynchronisation therapy. The temporal sparse free form deformation image registration method was optimised for LA feature tracking in RGCT images and used to estimate 3D LA endocardial motion. The area and fibre reservoir strains were calculated over the LA body. Universal atrial coordinates and a human atrial fibre atlas enabled the regional strain calculation and the fibre strain calculation along the local myofibre orientation, respectively.It was found that global reservoir strains were significantly reduced in the HFrEF + AF group patients compared with the HFrEF-only group patients (area strain: 11.2 ± 4.8% vs. 25.3 ± 12.6%, P = 0.001; fibre strain: 4.5 ± 2.0% vs. 15.2 ± 8.8%, P = 0.001), with HFrEF + AF patients having a greater regional reservoir strain dyssynchrony. All regional reservoir strains were reduced in the HFrEF + AF patient group, in whom the inferior wall strains exhibited the most significant differences. The global reservoir fibre strain and LA volume + posterior wall reservoir fibre strain exceeded LA volume alone and 2D global longitudinal strain (GLS) for AF classification (area-under-the-curve: global reservoir fibre strain: 0.94 ± 0.02, LA volume + posterior wall reservoir fibre strain: 0.95 ± 0.02, LA volume: 0.89 ± 0.03, 2D GLS: 0.90 ± 0.03).RGCT enables 3D LA motion estimation and strain calculation that outperforms 2D strain metrics and LA enlargement for AF classification. Differences in regional LA strain could reflect regional myocardial properties such as atrial fibrosis burden.

View details for DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1359715

View details for Web of Science ID 001198345000001

View details for PubMedID 38596691

View details for PubMedCentralID PMC11002108

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of pre-excitation gradients for eddy current-nulled convex optimized diffusion encoding (Pre-ENCODE) to mitigate eddy current-induced image distortions in diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI).METHODS: DWI sequences using monopolar (MONO), ENCODE, and Pre-ENCODE were evaluated in terms of the minimum achievable echo time (TE min

Abstract

Blood pressure gradient ([Formula: see text]) across an aortic coarctation (CoA) is an important measurement to diagnose CoA severity and gauge treatment efficacy. Invasive cardiac catheterization is currently the gold-standard method for measuring blood pressure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of [Formula: see text] estimates derived non-invasively using patient-specific 0D and 3D deformable wall simulations. Medical imaging and routine clinical measurements were used to create patient-specific models of patients with CoA (N = 17). 0D simulations were performed first and used to tune boundary conditions and initialize 3D simulations. [Formula: see text] across the CoA estimated using both 0D and 3D simulations were compared to invasive catheter-based pressure measurements for validation. The 0D simulations were extremely efficient ([Formula: see text] 15 s computation time) compared to 3D simulations ([Formula: see text] 30 h computation time on a cluster). However, the 0D [Formula: see text] estimates, unsurprisingly, had larger mean errors when compared to catheterization than 3D estimates (12.1 ± 9.9 mmHg vs 5.3 ± 5.4 mmHg). In particular, the 0D model performance degraded in cases where the CoA was adjacent to a bifurcation. The 0D model classified patients with severe CoA requiring intervention (defined as [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] 20 mmHg) with 76% accuracy and 3D simulations improved this to 88%. Overall, a combined approach, using 0D models to efficiently tune and launch 3D models, offers the best combination of speed and accuracy for non-invasive classification of CoA severity.

View details for DOI 10.1007/s10439-024-03457-5

View details for PubMedID 38341399