Pilot Grants

The Upstream Research Center is pleased to release the third round of requests for pilot proposals to catalyze research aimed at reducing cancer inequities due to structural and social determinants of health, including, but not limited to, structural racism, poverty, income inequality, climate change, food insecurity, social isolation, and housing insecurity.

REQUIRED ELEMENTS

  • Projects must describe proposed research relevant to structural and social determinants experienced in persistent poverty areas. Of particular interest are a focus on areas in counties that are part of Stanford, UC Davis, and UC San Francisco’s catchment areas (i.e., Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Contra Costa, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Lake County, Madera, Marin, Mendocino, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, San Benito, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Sierra, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Yolo, Yuba). A detailed list of persistent poverty census tracts in the country can be found here and a map that highlights persistent poverty areas within our catchment areas can be found here.
  •  Proposals related to Evaluation of California’s Guaranteed Income Projects (Project 1 of the parent grant) are welcome, but applicants must contact us at upstreamcenter@stanford.edu before contacting collaborators or submitting a proposal related to guaranteed income approaches.
  • Pilots are expected to have a deliverable, which could be a presentation, publication, poster, or report of preliminary results.

AREAS OF INTEREST

We welcome a broad range of topics related to structural social determinants and cancer risk in persistent poverty areas. Topic areas of interest include, but are not limited to, the following examples:

  • Understanding how structural factors (e.g., poverty policy, climate change, structural racism) influence biological mechanisms in order to inform the development of surrogate endpoints for evaluating structural interventions.
  • Developing and evaluating innovative community-based interventions (e.g., health worker models, pesticide reduction strategies) to reduce cancer burden.
  • Developing methods (e.g., simulation models, quasi-experimental designs) to evaluate the impact of policies (e.g., basic income experiments, increasing access to broadband internet coverage, transportation interventions) on cancer incidence and mortality.
     

Preference will be given to:

  • Projects focused on addressing the needs of rural communities here within the catchment areas.
  • Projects focused on the development of interventions, preferably with community engagement.
  • Team science collaborations across two or more Upstream Research Center institutional partners (i.e., Stanford, UCD, and UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Centers).

Important Dates

Applications are due Nov 15, 2024, at 5 PM PST. We hosted an informational session on June 18, 2024. (View presentation slides and recording here). 

Amount and Period of Funding

Awards will be granted for one year and must be completed within the 12-month award period, May 1, 2025, through April 30, 2026, and up to $75,000 in direct costs. Carry forward of awards cannot be supported. Allowable expenses include personnel, travel, materials, supplies, and other research expenses. All unexpended funds within the award period will be forfeited. We anticipate making three awards. At least one award will support preparation for an intervention study. 

Eligibility Criteria

  • Stanford, UCD, and UCSF faculty with PI eligibility and post-doctoral scholars.
  • Post-doctoral scholar applicants are required to have at least one year remaining of their fellowship and a PI-eligible faculty mentor.
  • Community partners or faculty can serve as project leaders of pilot projects. However, for administrative purposes, a faculty (Stanford, UCD, UCSF) Co-Principal Investigator is needed.
  • Community partners will need to have UEI registration through sam.gov.
  • Early career scholars whose pilot project is related to a federally funded training grant would need to check with their NIH Program officer & their institution administrator if this is allowed and if there is no overlap with the Upstream grant funding period (May 1, 2025 - April 30, 2026).). These projects should be designed to be completed within the one-year time frame and are intended to generate preliminary data for additional externally funded research.
  • IRB Approval. Funding cannot be granted until IRB approval is obtained and reviewed at NIH, so early discussions with IRB is highly recommended. IRB approval is required for funding dispersal and are generally not a valid rationale for no-cost extension requests.

Application Guidelines

  1. Quality: The proposed project must advance research at the intersection of persistent poverty and cancer control and meet high standards for scientific rigor and innovation.
  2. Relevance to the mission of the Center: Proposals will be judged on how well they synergize with the Center’s research projects and the overall mission described here.
  3. Investigators: Reviewers will be asked to evaluate the qualifications of the PI and key personnel and whether the proposal promotes cross-center and cross-network collaborations.
  4. Community engagement: The proposal should encourage active engagement of community partners in all stages of research that contribute to future publications, presentation and/or other dissemination activities.
  5. Scope: The proposed research must be completed within the project period and within the budget limit. 

Additional Evaluation Criteria for applications working with community partners

  1.  Responsiveness and relevance to community partner priorities. The proposal should demonstrate a detailed understanding of the community partner’s priorities, describing how the project will facilitate the advancement of these goals
  2. Capacity building. The proposed research should strengthen bi-directional relationships between the Center’s researchers and community partners and build the research and data capacity of both institutional and community partners in community-engaged research. This needs to be reflected in the budget, demonstrating an equitable allocation of resources between community partners and researchers. 
  3. Letter of Support. A brief letter of support from the identified community partner describing their role on the project (e.g., Project Lead, subcontractor, vendor), compensation, and their plan to disseminate key findings back to the community is required.

 

Contact Us

For questions regarding scope of the proposal, criteria for awards or the review process, contact upstreamcenter@stanford.edu with any questions.