|
|
The 7 Percent Solution32% reduction in traffic from 7% loss of jobs...what up with that?By Kevin T. Boyd Recent local news reports informed South Bay Area residents of something we'd already noticed: Traffic is better since the dot-coms dot-bombed.
As a daily commuter from South San Jose to Palo Alto, starting at the height of the dot-com boom, I definitely noticed the drop-off in traffic. What took about an hour when I started is now only 35 minutes. But where did the traffic go? The reduction seems disproportionate to the number of lost jobs. My late, great friend Carl Neiburger would point out how easy it is to lie with numbers, but I took a look at Santa Clara County employment statistics for that period. From the height of the boom (based on low unemployment) in December 2000 to the bottom of the crash in October 2001, employment went from just over a million to a bit over 940 thousand jobs. That's a loss of 68,400 out of 1,012,600 jobs, or just under a seven percent loss. Versus the 32% reduction in traffic. Why such a big difference? Some might say that in a recession, fewer people had spare time and money to drive around. I have a different theory: The seven percent that left the area and unburdened our freeways were, well, the word "idiots" comes to mind. To be a little kinder, perhaps we should say, these people were not averse to taking risks and not the most, ahem, "strategic" of thinkers. The highway and the information superhighway had a lot in common. So a little social Darwinism worked it's magic and made all the rest of our lives a little easier. Our freeways would be much clearer if people would just be seven percent smarter. We need more and better commute alternatives, driver education, traffic enforcement and better road design to build on the effects of this "seven percent solution" to our recent traffic nightmares.
copyright © 2002 |