Note:In XOBIS, these references would be mostly either compositional-compositional or compositional-organizational Relationships.
1. Extensible Markup Language (XML) http://www.w3.org/XML/
2. For cataloging context, cf.:Joint Steering Committee for Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/jsc/index.html and:Library of Congress. Cataloging Policy & Support Office. http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/ In other places, we refer cataloging rules generally and internationally, but have been influenced predominantly by the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR2) and Library of Congress practice.
3.Library of Congress.Network Development and MARC Standards Office.MARC Standards. http://www.loc.gov/marc/
4. Joint Meeting of MARBI/CC:DA. 2000. http://www.ala.org/alcts/organization/div/marbi/marbi-ccda.html
5. Miller, Dick R.XML and MARC: A Choice or Replacement?Presented at the MARBI/CC:DA Joint Meeting , American Library Association, Chicago, 2000. http://elane.stanford.edu/laneauth/ALAChicago2000.html
6. Lane Medical Library.Medlane Project. http://medlane.stanford.edu/
7. National Library of Medicine (U.S.).NLM to Use XML and DTD for MEDLINE Data, Oct. 2000. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/news/medlinedata.html and the earlier announcement: New Data Format and Distribution Media for Licensees of NLM Data, Nov. 19, 1999.http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/xml_announce.html
8. National Library of Medicine (U.S.).Introduction to MeSH in XML Format, 2001. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/xmlmesh.html
9. Cover, Robin.National Library of Medicine (NLM) XML Data Formats, Mar. 7, 2001.http://xml.coverpages.org/nlmXML.html
10. Additional NLM Databases in XML Format (CCRIS, GENE-TOX, HSDB®, TOXLINE® Special, and ChemIDplus), 2001. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/license_announce/announce_aug_20.html
11. Library of Congress.Network Development and MARC Standards Office.MARC in XML and SGML, Aug. 6, 2002.http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/
12. Library of Congress.Network Development and MARC Standards Office.MODS: Metadata Object Description Schema, Mar. 27, 2002.http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/
13. Library of Congress.Network Development and MARC Standards Office.MARC XML, MARC 21 XML Schema, Apr. 16, 2002.http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml//
14. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative.http://dublincore.org/
15. Editeur. ONIX Product Information Standards. http://www.editeur.org/onix.html
16. Virginia Polytechnic Institute.Digital Library Research Laboratory.Open Archives Initiative.MARC XML. http://www.dlib.vt.edu/projects/OAi/marcxml/marcxml.html
17. Lam, K. T.Moving from MARC to XML, 1998. http://ihome.ust.hk/~lblkt/xml/marc2xml.html
18. BiblioML. http://www.culture.fr/BiblioML/
19. Carvalho, Joaquim de.XML and bibliographic data: the TVS (Transport, Validation and Services) model, 2002.http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla68/papers/075-095e.pdf
20. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Sept. 1997. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.htm
21. Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of Anglo-American Cataloging Rules. The Logical Structure of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 1998-1999. http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/jsc/docs.html
22. Delsey, Tom. Functional Analysis of the MARC 21 Bibliographic and Holdings Formats, Jan. 4, 2002. http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/home.html
23. Le Boeuf, Patrick. FRBR and further. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2001; 32(4):15-52.
24. Program for Cooperative Cataloging.PCC Task Group on Name Versus Subject Authorities. Final Report, Feb. 21, 2001.http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/archive/divworld.html
25. Ostrove, Geraldine E.Music Subject Cataloging and Form/Genre Implementation at the Library of Congress. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2001; 32(2):91-106.
26. Health Education Assets Library.HEAL Standards and Documentation, 2002.http://www.healcentral.org/documents.htm
27. Visual Resources Association. VRA Core Categories, Version 3.0., Feb. 20, 2002. http://www.vraweb.org/vracore3.htm
28. Lane Medical Library.Website. http://lane.stanford.edu/index.html
29. Miller, Dick R.Adding Luster to Librarianship: XML as an Enabling Technology, Jan. 2002. http://elane.stanford.edu/laneauth/Luster.html
30. Miller, Dick R.Bibliographic access management at Lane Medical Library:fin de millennium experimentation and bruised-edge innovation. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2000; 30(2/3):139-66. Cf. p. 164. http://xmlmarc.stanford.edu/dick.pdf
31. XOBIS Version 1.0a.2002. http://laneweb.stanford.edu:2380/wiki/medlane/schema [change when new site ready DM]
32. OASIS Technical Committee: RELAX NG, 2001- http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/
33. World Wide Web Consortium.XML Schema, 2000. http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema
34. Clark, James. RELAX NG and W3C XML Schema, 2002. http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/msg00217.html
35. XMLMARC Version 2.0.2002. http://laneweb.stanford.edu:2380/wiki/medlane/xmlmarc [change DM]
36. Clarke, Kevin S. Managing MARC with Open Source Software.LITA Guide 2002; 9(3):30-44
37. Clarke, Kevin S. "Updating MARC Records with XMLMARC." In: Tennant, Roy, ed: XML in Libraries: Case Studies of Practical Applications. New York: Neil-Schuman, 2002.
38. Raymond, Eric S.The Cathedral and the Bazaar, 2000. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/
39. Miller, Dick R.XML: Libraries' Strategic Opportunity.Library Journal NetConnect 2000 summer; 125(suppl):18-20,22. http://xmlmarc.stanford.edu/LJ/
40. XOBIS Electronic Discussion. http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/medlane-schema
41. XML4Lib Electronic Discussion.http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/XML4Lib/
42. Institute of Museum and Library Services.http://www.imls.gov/
43.National Library of Medicine (U.S.).Unified Medical Language System (UMLS).http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/
44. Library of Congress.Network Development and MARC Standards Office.Alphabetical List of Ambiguous Headings.http://www.loc.gov/marc/ambiguous-headings.html
45. Wool, Gregory. Filing and Precoordination:How Subject Headings are Displayed in Online Catalogs and Why it Matters. Cat Class Q 2000; 29(1/2):91-106. Observes that postcoordination has become more widespread and entrenched.
46. OCLC Online Computer Library Center. Office of Research. FAST: Faceted Application of Subject Terminology. http://wcp.oclc.org/fast/ This regards LCSH.
47. Savage, Allan.Changes in MeSH Data Structure.NLM Tech Bull 2000 Mar/Apr; 313:e2 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/ma00/ma00_mesh.html
48. Lane Medical Library.Community Information File.http://cifdb.stanford.edu Despite the name, this database consists of enriched MARC authority records transformed daily into pseudo-MARC bibliographic records to make their content fully searchable for both staff and users.Textword is used as a category (form) to identify the subset of this file consisting of experimental word/phrase authority records.
49. Princeton University. Cognitive Science Laboratory. WordNet: A Lexical Database for the English Language.http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/
50. HyperDic (based on WordNet).http://www.hyperdic.net/
51. Lexical FreeNet Connected Thesaurus.http://www.lexfn.com/
52. WordSmyth:The Educational Dictionary-Thesaurus, 2000.http://www.wordsmyth.net/
53. National Library of Medicine (U.S.).Specialist Lexicon Fact Sheet, Feb. 14, 2001.http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umlslex.html
54. Unicode Home Page.http://www.unicode.org/
55. Kuhn, Markus.A Summary of the International Standard Date and Time. Notation, 1995, rev. 2001. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html The standard itself from the International Organization for Standardization is referred to as ISO 8601:2000.
56. Bean, Carol A.; Green, Rebecca, editors. Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
57. Library of Congress.Thesaurus for Graphic Materials I: Subject Terms, 1995.http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/tgm1/ The indexing principles discussed are interesting, cf. especially:II.B. "Of" and "About", and: II.D. Generic and Specific. [shows the issues are coming up in grappling with problems]
58. MARC Code List for Relators, Sources, Descriptive Conventions. Web Version November 28, 2001. http://www.loc.gov/marc/relators/relahome.html
59. Tillett, Barbara B. Authority Control on the Web, Jan. 23, 2001. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/tillett_paper.html
60. Smiraglia, Richard P., editor. Origins, Content, and Future of AACR2 Revised. Chicago and London: American Library Association, 1992.
61. Library of Congress.Cataloging Directorate. Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan, Revised July, 2002. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/actionplan.html Based on the invitational Bicentennial Conference on Bibliographic Control for the New Millennium held in 2002.
62. Heaney, Michael. Object-oriented cataloging. Information Technology and Libraries 1995 Sep; 14(3):135-53.
63.Ridley, Mark.Beyond MARC, 1997. http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/200/300/jsc_aacr/beyond/r-beyond.htm
65. Library of Congress.METS Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard. http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/
66. Miller, Dick R.Maintaining Standards without Excessive Standardization, 1995.http://xmlmarc.stanford.edu/mla1995.html