In this subject I tend to be idealistic so I had to give this some thought. I certainly think it is the foundation of most of what is good in this world. In working with the horses is it enough to get them to do something they are uncomfortable with? Very much like humans this will in part depend on whether trust accompanies that love. The horses must at this point in the course sense we mean them no harm but is this the same as having nothing but good intentions? Afterall, they rely heavily on instinct. Being domesticated doesn’t squash this survival mechanism. If both trust and love are there is THIS enough? I trust and love my husband but he could not talk me into skydiving! Equally important we must consider what are that particular horses’ life experiences, temperament, external influence in that moment and perception of the task.
As with our human patients we must always weigh the benefit of persuasion with the ultimate outcome keeping in mind our methods will need constant adjustment depending on the goal and patient.
Comment by: Tamara at November 5, 2009 8:00 AM
What is love to a horse, or to another person for that matter? Many times in class we saw people petting the horses by way of asking them to do something, like cross the scary space blanket. But the petting didn't work. The horse thought the petting meant "do just what you're doing, Good Boy!" which was standing still.
Love to a horse means protection and survival, which in turn means strong leadership. Safety around horses means that the horse looks to the human as the leader, the decision maker, and doesn't take it into his head to bolt, rear, or buck when he is afraid or uncertain.
Love for our patients doesn't mean we will overlook their self-destructive habits, prescribe them anything they ask for, allow them to violate our physical and emotional boundaries, or absolve them of the need to make responsible choices.
The trend in natural horsemanship arose in reaction to cruel and punitive methods of "breaking" horses--twitches, painful hobbles, beatings. At the other extreme, spoiling a horse results in a confused, insecure, and possibly dangerous animal. A horse's #1 priority as a prey anima is to feel safe. Most horses have as the #2 priority, food. While they can be quite affectionate and forgiving, they do not love us as a spouse or a pet loves us. (Horses are generally not pets in the domesticated sense.)
Sometimes tough love is what is needed, with horses, pets, children, patients, and colleagues. "Needed" is the operative term. What does the other individual need for his her greatest good? Sometimes that is not what -we- need to feel loved, loving, enabling, or co-dependent.
Comment by: Beverley Kane, MD at November 5, 2009 10:10 AM
Sherrie raises an important point in patient psychology, and I learned a small but vital lesson about keeping the type of animal (i.e., patient) in mind.
One of my first jobs was in a vet clinic, and I've grown up with regular interaction with cats and dogs. However, after the first day of observing several dozen horses in the paddock, I realized that I had brought an assumption about their behavior to class.
It was a surprise to remind myself that horses are prey animals. They will not act like dogs or cats, who are predators. Instead, horses will interact in a herd mentality, in which the survival mechanism runs deep. Even the placement of the horses' eyes is a critical adaptation, creating a large visual field to scan for threats.
Ultimately, the cues they look for in human direction -- such as who is the leader? -- are quite different than what predator animals might seek. This was a good reminder to me about focusing on the patient and his/her unique needs.